Friday, May 05, 2006

The one where Faunty is right

One of my sisters, the one that's in her third year of university, recently lost an argument with her friends, in which she said: "Capitalism causes hurricanes."

It may be easy to laugh at initially, but it's true.

Capitalism causes:
-global warming*
-sweatshops
-terrorism (indirectly)
-tsunamis
-toxic waste
-the depletion of natural resources
-hopelessness
-unsafe exploitation of nuclear power (particularly in Saskatchewan, which has the third largest uranium deposit in the world)
-famine and disease in Africa and other poor countries
-overpopulation in third world countries
-unsustainable growth in wealthy countries
-hatred
-foolish waste
-drought
-homelessness (in wealthy countries)
-unemployment ( " " ")
-a sense of entitlement in the wealthy (and by wealthy I mean anyone who can access the internet)
-disenfranchisment of minorities
-illegal wars
-genetically modified food
-agricultural degredation
-dairy companies being able to agressively promote cow's milk to be given to children daily, resulting in various illnesses
-soy being sold as a health food, when really it's toxic waste and actually depletes the body's protien and B vitamin stores
-government and corporate propeganda
-holes in the ozone
-uncontrollable governments
-uncontrollable poverty
-etc., etc., etc.

When people are given unlimited power to amass wealth by any means, they do it. They lie to manipulate both their customers and their sweatshop workers. They exploit others, caring only about their stock profits, and leaving the rest of the world to suffer.

And through capitalism, consumers benefit from the exploitation of those across the world, without even realizing it. Capitalism creates greed and creates a sense of inferiority in those who have less while encouraging those with more to demonstrate their wealth.

Consider this:

Would you rather make $100,000 thousand a year and have everyone else make $80,000 a year, or would you rather earn 150,000 a year if everyone else made $170,000? Even if you were able to pick the second option, wasn't it a hard choice? That insatiable desire to have more, be more and live more than others is rooted in capitalistic principles.

Money eats people's souls. And capitalism started it all.

*If you want the logic behind these comments, just ask. I have proof for each of these examples that I'd be more than happy to share.

11 comments:

Jen said...

You are so knowledgeable! I'm the first to admit that I don't keep up with politics at all so some of those points were a little lost on me. ;)

Just for the record- I initally chose $150,000 but am now reconsidering ...

x said...

genetically modified food = welcome to the 21st century. evolution takes many forms.

tsunami = have occurred way before the scourge of humanity. mother nature knows what she's doing. it's just a shame that the last one devastated asia rather than the usa.

hatred = can't have light without dark

holes in the ozone = i'm all for global warming. the hotter the better. bikini's all 'round.

hopelessness = hope springs eternal

'wasn't it a hard choice?' = no.

geeksters said...

Genetically modified foods lack the nutirents of organic foods and deplete said nutrients out of the soil, creating an environment where natural foods can no longer grow. Also, these foods cause diseases and rely on toxic chemicals for fertilizer.(http://www.connectotel.com/gmfood/gmwrong.html)

Remember the bio dome experiment where all the elements necessary for survival were there, but the organizims within couldn't survive? Same story, bigger and equally-flawed experiment. If you have time, check out this book, "Powerdown: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon Society."
I trust you'll find the chapter titled "Waiting for the Magical Elixer" informative.

Actually scientists (from either Canadian Geographic, National Geographic or Macleans) say that with global warming, the earth's surface will temporarily be heated to unprecedented levels. Then the heat will shift to the ocean (I can't remember the scientific name for that process), and the earth will cool down, being harshly cold in some areas and extremely hot in others, leaving only a small central area habitable for humanity. That's if the world's natural balance isn't thrown off kilter by the extinction of species necessary to the survival and maintenance of life.

Did you know there are "feedback cycles" that are the earth's way of accelerating the climate change we are causing? For example, there are enormous stores of carbon dioxide in the ice up North. As that ice melts because of human activity, that CO2 will be released in to the air further exaccerbating the problem.

and I don't really think it's funny when scientists like David Suzuki are saying we are in the last seconds to make change, if in fact an earth-saving change is still possible.

Global warming, caused by capitalism, has a major impact on the disruption of the natural systems, thereby causing and/or increasing the suffering from "natural" disasters. Particularly with hurricanes, deforestation, based on a capitalist economy, contributed to last year's situation.

True all hatred is not inspired by capitalism, but when some are condemned to lives of abject poverty no matter how hard they work (Indonesian sweatshops), or how impossible it is to find work (in Aphganistan or Irac prior to the war, one third of young men were called "wall-standers" because they could find nothing to do to provide themselves with an income -- acccording to acclaimed war correspondant Gwyen Dyer), it must be hard not to hate the wealthy country that's killing your people in order to get cheap oil.

Must be hard not to hate the system keeping you and your loved ones perpetually poor while those in wealthier countries spend more on pet food annually that it would take to feed all the world's people -- according to Unicef Canada CEO and President, formerly an assistant secretary general for the United Nations.

The IMF, World Bank and World Trade Centre say they want to help poor countries become more self-reliant by providing loans to the poorest of the poor countries with extreme funding conditions including the privatization of water -- and that it's illegal for anyone in these countries to drink water, even rainwater that falls on their rooftops, without paying for it?

And these countries often have to pay over half of their annual GDP in interest. Not exactly fair, huh?

Being trapped in a cycle of poverty, perhaps living in an African country raising dozens of children while you wither away, dying of Aids because pharmaceutical countries refuse to allow the copyrights on their drugs to be revoked so generic companies could provide affordable medication, would leave a person no choice but to lose hope.

You picked option 2 and had no trouble with it? Congratulations on surprising me with your humanity.

geeksters said...

Jen,

Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. And I had a hard time with the question too. Seems like things would be easier if we were richer than everyone else, huh?


Faunty,

Good luck winning that argument then.

While I love socialism in theory, in practice it's impossible - some mean capitalist guy always manages to take over.

I don't like capitalism because of the inequality it creates. But if natural capitalists are making sure their demands on the earth are sustainable, that is at least a step in the right direction.

As far as solutions, I don't have doable ones. For starters, I'd get rid of Bush, the IMF, the WTO and the World Bank. Then I'd get the UN to create laws about an international minimum wage and make international environmental regulations with stiff penaties that go beyond financial punishments. But, like I said, that won't happen.

x said...

feeling, as i am, extremely and uncharacteristically pessismistic today, i would be thrilled to watch our pitiful species burnt to a crisp or frozen to death.

armageddon could not come soon enough.

Jen said...

I'm sure you weren't confusing to those who know even a little bit about politics. I don't but still loved reading your post. Always willing to learn a little something new.

geeksters said...

Jen,

Basically all I'm saying is that in Canada and other countries with similar political views, money seems to be the most important factor - more important than individual lives and more important than the resulting environmental consequences.

Is that clearer?

geeksters said...

Good for Brazil. Now that you mention that, I vaugely remember something about Brazil arguing with the drug companies.

My information is from an intensive class last summer, so pardon me for using out-dated information. And nice work catching that.

I don't think "the overwhelming majority" of white people think Aids is a just punishment for anything, much less for circumstances beyond an individual's control, like race, sexual orientation, poverty, misinformation, etc.

I do, however, think people find it difficult to care, really care, about things happening to others so different from themselves.

It's easy to ignore the social problems leading to prostitution, for example, if all you think is something along the lines of, "I would never do that. I don't understand how they could do that to themselves."

And it's easy to ignore those that live far away and look different from our own fathers, mothers, friends, siblings and children.

Too bad for the people of Babylon and their tall tower, huh?

x said...

hooking is the worlds oldest profession, its the criminality of it that causes the problems, and again, alot of what screws these girls up comes down to christianity and guilt.

i've got alot of friends who are or have been hookers. and it is, ultimately soul destroying. only the strongest survive for long in that job.

it is, however, honest.

who is the bigger whore? the woman who sets her price and performs the negotiated service?

or the woman that marries a rich man she doesn't love, and spits out a couple of kids, knowing that once she has the kids, even if they divorce she will be taken care of for life?

geeksters said...

You're right, there doesn't seem to be much difference.

I interviewed a woman who had been abused for the documentary. (I talked about her in another comment when we were talking about child abuse.) She ran away from her abuse home when she was 14 and started living on the street. What other options for survival did she have?

She's quite the courageous woman.

Anonymous said...

best regards, nice info http://www.buy-dot-matrix-printers.info/label_printer_capatible_with_aloha.html Charge blackberry device 92s battery car Email filter mail messenger yahoo Winning number lotto 649 Printable pictures sports Wooden sofas for less Cell phone in iraq Organic baby crib mattresses Car import insurance jap Ford diesel engine specs Affordable junior tennis in new york discount mattresses houston 4 color printing digital printing contact us Barcode reader stylus Audio car show 1973 oldsmobile omega info